NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 811 MHz vs 601 MHz
• Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 63.76 GTexel / s vs 48.08 GTexel / s
• Around 33% better floating-point performance: 1,530 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2801 vs 1961
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 304
• Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8560 vs 5326
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.528 vs 10.054
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 731.755 vs 544.601
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.486 vs 1.46
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.15 vs 22.103
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.659 vs 36.553
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4133 vs 3855
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4133 vs 3855

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 vs 3651
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 3331
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 vs 3651
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 3331

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2801 1961
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	340 304
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8560 5326
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.528 10.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	731.755 544.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.486 1.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42.15 22.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	87.659 36.553
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4133 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3651 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3331 4470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4133 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3651 4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3331 4470

Compare specifications (specs)