NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M versus NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 0 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 811 MHz versus 601 MHz
- Environ 33% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 63.76 GTexel / s versus 48.08 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,530 gflops versus 1,154 gflops
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 100 Watt
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2794 versus 1947
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 341 versus 300
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8652 versus 5827
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 29.528 versus 10.054
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 731.755 versus 544.601
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.486 versus 1.46
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.15 versus 22.103
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 87.659 versus 36.553
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4133 versus 3855
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4133 versus 3855
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 versus 1 June 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 811 MHz versus 601 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 63.76 GTexel / s versus 48.08 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,530 gflops versus 1,154 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2794 versus 1947 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 versus 300 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8652 versus 5827 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.528 versus 10.054 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 731.755 versus 544.601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.486 versus 1.46 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.15 versus 22.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.659 versus 36.553 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4133 versus 3855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4133 versus 3855 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2800 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 versus 3651
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 versus 3331
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 versus 3651
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 versus 3331
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2800 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4957 versus 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4470 versus 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4957 versus 3651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4470 versus 3331 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | NVIDIA Quadro K4000M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2794 | 1947 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 341 | 300 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8652 | 5827 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.528 | 10.054 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 731.755 | 544.601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.486 | 1.46 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.15 | 22.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 87.659 | 36.553 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4133 | 3855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | 4957 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 4470 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4133 | 3855 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | 4957 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 4470 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 964 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | NVIDIA Quadro K4000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK106 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 30 May 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $189.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 854 | 855 |
| Prix maintenant | $177.99 | |
| Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.67 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 811 MHz | 601 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,530 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 960 | 960 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 63.76 GTexel / s | 48.08 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | large |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96.0 GB / s | 89.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
AMDFirePro V7900
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
AMDRadeon E9260 PCIe
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770M vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 3200
