NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition versus AMD Radeon R7 260X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition and AMD Radeon R7 260X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 45% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 89.26 GTexel / s versus 61.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 1344 versus 896
- Environ 9% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,142 gflops versus 1,971 gflops
- Environ 15% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 115 Watt
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3699 versus 3195
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 557 versus 523
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 826.477 versus 804.436
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6030 versus 3845
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3657 versus 3485
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6030 versus 3845
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3657 versus 3485
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 November 2013 versus 8 October 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 89.26 GTexel / s versus 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 versus 896 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,142 gflops versus 1,971 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 115 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3699 versus 3195 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 557 versus 523 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 826.477 versus 804.436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6030 versus 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3657 versus 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6030 versus 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3657 versus 3485 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 260X
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.745 versus 24.986
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.673 versus 2.362
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.088 versus 35.269
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 221.539 versus 55.394
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 versus 24.986 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.673 versus 2.362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 versus 35.269 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 versus 55.394 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3347 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3699 | 3195 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 557 | 523 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11920 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.986 | 43.745 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 826.477 | 804.436 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.362 | 3.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.269 | 64.088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 55.394 | 221.539 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6030 | 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3657 | 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6030 | 3845 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3657 | 3485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1481 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition | AMD Radeon R7 260X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | Bonaire |
| Date de sortie | 8 November 2013 | 8 October 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 635 | 636 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $139 | |
| Prix maintenant | $239 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,142 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 896 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 89.26 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 2,080 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Longeur | 170 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 104 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs
ATIFireGL V5600
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 120 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon R7 260X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon Pro 460
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon RX 550X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAT600 Mobile
