NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and NVIDIA GRID K260Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 745 MHz
- Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 173.2 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- Around 82% better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 vs 6474
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3582 vs 1898
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 1954
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 vs 6474
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3582 vs 1898
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 1954
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 September 2013 vs 28 June 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 863 MHz vs 745 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 173.2 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops vs 2,289 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9209 vs 6474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3582 vs 1898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 1954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9209 vs 6474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3582 vs 1898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 1954 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K260Q
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K260Q
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GRID K260Q |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.133 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1441.971 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.36 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.264 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 148.747 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9209 | 6474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3582 | 1898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 1954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9209 | 6474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3582 | 1898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 1954 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2949 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GRID K260Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK110B | GK104 |
| Launch date | 10 September 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $937 |
| Place in performance rating | 551 | 552 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 902 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 863 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 173.2 GTexel / s | 95.36 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,080 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAGRID K260Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
