NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 863 MHz
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 902 MHz
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.772 vs 30.133
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 179.567 vs 148.747
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 3582
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3331
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 3582
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3331

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

• 4x more texture fill rate: 173.2 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• 3.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 640
• 3x better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1441.971 vs 757.295
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 3.67
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.264 vs 49.875
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 vs 5157
• Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 vs 5157

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.772 30.133
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	757.295 1441.971
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.67 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.875 64.264
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	179.567 148.747
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5157 9209
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5834 3582
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7859 3331
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5157 9209
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5834 3582
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7859 3331

Compare specifications (specs)