NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M vs ATI Radeon HD 4550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M and ATI Radeon HD 4550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 21.3x more texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 19.2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 80
- 25.5x better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 91% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1310 MHz
- 16.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3797 vs 236
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 558
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 558
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2013 vs 30 September 2008 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1310 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3797 vs 236 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 558 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4550
- 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 429 vs 422
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 429 vs 422 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | ATI Radeon HD 4550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3797 | 236 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 | 429 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12854 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 558 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | ATI Radeon HD 4550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | RV710 |
Launch date | 11 May 2013 | 30 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 764 | 767 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 600 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 96 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 10.48 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1310 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |