NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 574 MHz
- 3.2x more texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
- 3.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 448
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 204 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3835 vs 2707
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12504 vs 9891
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 vs 24.377
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 2.66
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 vs 3501
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 vs 3501
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2013 vs 10 December 2010 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 574 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 204 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3835 vs 2707 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12504 vs 9891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 vs 24.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 vs 2.66 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 vs 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 vs 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3335 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 6000
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 2988 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 451 vs 415
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 793.755 vs 705.616
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.891 vs 13.832
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 90.839 vs 78.867
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 451 vs 415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.755 vs 705.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.891 vs 13.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 90.839 vs 78.867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 vs 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 vs 3679 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3835 | 2707 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 415 | 451 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12504 | 9891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | 24.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | 793.755 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | 2.66 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | 34.891 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | 90.839 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 | 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 | 3501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | 3689 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3335 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK104 | GF100 |
Launch date | 11 May 2013 | 10 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 771 | 774 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,399 | |
Price now | $332.21 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.86 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 574 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s | 32.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 204 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 143.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |