NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 vs 39.934
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 vs 705.616
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.692 vs 3.631
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 vs 13.832
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.513 vs 78.867
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 vs 4868
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3679
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 vs 4868
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3679
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 11 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz vs 823 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 vs 39.934 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 vs 705.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 vs 3.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 vs 13.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 vs 78.867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 vs 4868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 vs 4868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 47.04 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
- Around 63% better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 1,505 gflops
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3818 vs 3370
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 422 vs 245
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12881 vs 10976
- Around 19% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1466 vs 1231
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 47.04 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 1,505 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3818 vs 3370 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 vs 245 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12881 vs 10976 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 vs 1231 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3370 | 3818 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 | 422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10976 | 12881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 | 39.934 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 | 705.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 | 3.631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 | 13.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 | 78.867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 | 4868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 | 4868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1231 | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 11 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 765 | 767 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz | 797 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 823 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | 1536 |
Floating-point performance | 1,505 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 47.04 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 122 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | Up to 3840x2160 |
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | Up to 2048x1536 |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
SLI options | 1 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |