NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M versus NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 574 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.0 GTexel / s versus 32.1 GTexel / s
- 3.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 448
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,448 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 122 Watt versus 204 Watt
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3846 versus 2707
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12520 versus 9891
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 versus 24.377
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 versus 2.66
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 versus 3501
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 versus 3501
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2013 versus 10 December 2010 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 574 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s versus 32.1 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 448 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt versus 204 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3846 versus 2707 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12520 versus 9891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 versus 24.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 versus 2.66 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 versus 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 versus 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3335 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 6000
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 20% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2988 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 451 versus 418
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 793.755 versus 705.616
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.891 versus 13.832
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 90.839 versus 78.867
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2988 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 451 versus 418 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.755 versus 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.891 versus 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 90.839 versus 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 versus 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 versus 3679 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3846 | 2707 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 | 451 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12520 | 9891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | 24.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | 793.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | 2.66 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | 34.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | 90.839 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 | 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 | 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2013 | 10 December 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 762 | 774 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4,399 | |
| Prix maintenant | $332.21 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.86 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s | 32.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 248 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 143.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIRadeon X600 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
AMDRadeon 630
