AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2500 MHz
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 535 vs 413
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.414 vs 13.832
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 vs 78.867
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 11 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 823 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 122 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 2500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 535 vs 413 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 vs 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 vs 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 1536 vs 512
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3810 vs 1938
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12496 vs 9616
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 vs 24.788
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.616 vs 638.196
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 2.619
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 vs 2809
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 vs 2809
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 102.0 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops vs 947.2 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3810 vs 1938 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12496 vs 9616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 vs 24.788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 vs 638.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 vs 2.619 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 vs 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 vs 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 vs 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 vs 3666 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1938 | 3810 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 535 | 413 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9616 | 12496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | 39.934 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | 3.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | 78.867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | 4868 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 3679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Cape Verde | GK104 |
| Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 11 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 768 | 771 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 797 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM with others
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro P520
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
