NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M and NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 43% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 574 MHz
3.2x more texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
3.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 448
2.4x better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 225 Watt
2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3818 vs 1306
Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 vs 24.784
Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 3.125

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	11 May 2013 vs 25 July 2011
Core clock speed	823 MHz vs 574 MHz
Texture fill rate	102.0 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1536 vs 448
Floating-point performance	2,448 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	122 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3818 vs 1306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	39.934 vs 24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.631 vs 3.125

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 2500 MHz
Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 422
Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.512 vs 705.616
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 13.832
Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 93.533 vs 78.867

Specifications (specs)
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	3132 MHz vs 2500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	444 vs 422
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	917.512 vs 705.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.227 vs 13.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	93.533 vs 78.867

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3818

1306

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

422

444

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

39.934

24.784

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

705.616

917.512

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.631

3.125

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13.832

44.227

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

78.867

93.533

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M	NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark	3818	1306
PassMark - G2D Mark	422	444
Geekbench - OpenCL	12881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	39.934	24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	705.616	917.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.631	3.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	13.832	44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	78.867	93.533
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1466

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M	NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK104	GF100
Launch date	11 May 2013	25 July 2011
Place in performance rating	767	769
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$5,489
Technical info
Boost clock speed	797 MHz
Core clock speed	823 MHz	574 MHz
CUDA cores	1536
Floating-point performance	2,448 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	1536	448
Texture fill rate	102.0 GTexel / s	32.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	122 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
SLI options	1
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length		248 mm
API support
DirectX	12 API	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB / s	150.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA