NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M versus NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M and NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 823 MHz versus 574 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.0 GTexel / s versus 32.1 GTexel / s
- 3.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 448
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,448 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 84% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 122 Watt versus 225 Watt
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3818 versus 1306
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.934 versus 24.784
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 versus 3.125
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2013 versus 25 July 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz versus 574 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s versus 32.1 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 448 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3818 versus 1306 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 versus 24.784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 versus 3.125 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 6 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3132 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 versus 422
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.512 versus 705.616
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 versus 13.832
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 93.533 versus 78.867
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 3132 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 versus 422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.512 versus 705.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 versus 13.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.533 versus 78.867 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3818 | 1306 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 | 444 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12881 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 39.934 | 24.784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.616 | 917.512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | 3.125 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.832 | 44.227 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 78.867 | 93.533 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4868 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4868 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1466 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK104 | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 11 May 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 767 | 769 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $5,489 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s | 32.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 248 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | 150.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470
