NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 130 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1536 MB
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 27 June 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 130 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1536 MB |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 85.25 GTexel / s versus 36.08 GTexel / s
- Environ 80% de pipelines plus haut: 1152 versus 640
- Environ 77% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,046 gflops versus 1,155 gflops
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11808 versus 9697
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 versus 3685
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 versus 3685
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1333 versus 979
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 85.25 GTexel / s versus 36.08 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,046 gflops versus 1,155 gflops |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11808 versus 9697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3685 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1333 versus 979 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2513 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9697 | 11808 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 | 1333 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 27 June 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 940 | 941 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1152 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s | 85.25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 888 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 823 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Longeur | 241 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4800
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5900
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDRadeon 540X Mobile
