NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 90% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 336
- Environ 28% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,389 gflops versus 1,088.6 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3062 versus 2768
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10438 versus 8692
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.427 versus 2.201
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.83 versus 62.233
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 versus 3754
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 versus 3754
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 March 2014 versus 17 May 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 versus 336 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops versus 1,088.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3062 versus 2768 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10438 versus 8692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 versus 2.201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 versus 62.233 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 versus 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 versus 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3332 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 5% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 45.4 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 431 versus 226
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.82 versus 22.828
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 623.187 versus 210.585
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.402 versus 28.662
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 797 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 45.4 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 431 versus 226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.82 versus 22.828 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 versus 210.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.402 versus 28.662 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3062 | 2768 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | 431 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10438 | 8692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.828 | 25.82 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 210.585 | 623.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.427 | 2.201 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.662 | 30.402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.83 | 62.233 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4938 | 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4938 | 3754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK104 | GF114 |
Date de sortie | 10 March 2014 | 17 May 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 878 | 865 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
Prix maintenant | $353.59 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.61 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 915 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz | 810 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1152 or 640 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | 1,088.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 336 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | 45.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,950 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 99 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-Way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision |