NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 108.3 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 1344 vs 640
- Around 87% better floating-point performance: 2,599 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12758 vs 11526
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 960.114 vs 642.715
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.038 vs 2.933
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.57 vs 26.532
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6350 vs 4843
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3329
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6350 vs 4843
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3683
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3329
- 11.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1336 vs 117
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12758 vs 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 vs 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 vs 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 vs 26.532 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 vs 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 vs 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 vs 117 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 941 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 967 MHz
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 3496
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 279
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 34.836
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 81.753
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 941 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 967 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 3496 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 279 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 34.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 81.753 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3496 | 3901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 279 | 521 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12758 | 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 | 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 | 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 | 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 | 117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK104 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 691 | 707 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $299.01 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 967 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIFirePro V8800
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAQuadro 7000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
AMDRadeon E8950
