NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 42 billion / sec
- 3.2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 480
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 1,345.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 13144
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.273 vs 34.483
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 777.677 vs 706.104
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.196 vs 30.405
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3658
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3320
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3658
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3320
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 26 March 2010 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s vs 42 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops vs 1,345.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1536 MB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 vs 13144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 vs 34.483 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 vs 706.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 vs 30.405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3320 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4121 vs 3828
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 333
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.245 vs 3.914
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.875 vs 82.511
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5110 vs 4501
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5110 vs 4501
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4121 vs 3828 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 vs 333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 vs 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 vs 82.511 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 vs 4501 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 vs 4501 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3828 | 4121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | 430 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | 13144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | 34.483 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | 706.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | 4.245 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | 30.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | 106.875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | 5110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | 5110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3320 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK104 | GF100 |
Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 26 March 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 755 | 758 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $71.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 61.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 700 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | 480 |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 1,345.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s | 42 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way, 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Memory clock speed | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |