Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 993 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
8.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 122 Watt
Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 328

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 September 2014 vs 12 March 2014
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz vs 993 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 122 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	572 vs 328

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

Around 19% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 800 MHz
Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 vs 2536
Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 vs 2536
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1586
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1586
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2418
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2418
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3811 vs 1626
2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 5885

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	954 MHz vs 800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4501 vs 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4501 vs 2536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 2418
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 2418
PassMark - G3D Mark	3811 vs 1626
Geekbench - OpenCL	15023 vs 5885

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2536

4501

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2536

4501

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1586

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1586

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2418

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2418

3356

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

572

328

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1626

3811

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5885

15023

Name	Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2536	4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2536	4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1586	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1586	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2418	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2418	3356
PassMark - G2D Mark	572	328
PassMark - G3D Mark	1626	3811
Geekbench - OpenCL	5885	15023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		34.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		776.776
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.915
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		36.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		82.511
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1611

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 8.0	Kepler
Code name	Broadwell GT3e	GK104
Launch date	5 September 2014	12 March 2014
Place in performance rating	724	779
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	993 MHz
Core clock speed	800 MHz	954 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	122 Watt
Transistor count	189 million	3,540 million
CUDA cores		1536
Floating-point performance		3,050 gflops
Pipelines		1536
Texture fill rate		127.1 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	MXM-B (3.0)
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		large
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		8 GB
Memory bandwidth		160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width		256 Bit
Memory type		GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA