NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M vs AMD Radeon HD 7450M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M and AMD Radeon HD 7450M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 914 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 8x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 640 vs 160
- 6.4x better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 224.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 7.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2580 vs 330
- 20.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9741 vs 476
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1832
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1832
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 7 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s vs 5.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops vs 224.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2580 vs 330 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9741 vs 476 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1832 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7450M
- 10.7x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 217
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3493 vs 3358
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3493 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 217 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3493 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3493 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7450M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | AMD Radeon HD 7450M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2580 | 330 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9741 | 476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.396 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 373.644 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.54 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.412 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4148 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3493 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4148 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3493 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | AMD Radeon HD 7450M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GM107 | Seymour |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 7 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 814 | 816 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 700 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | 224.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 GTexel / s | 5.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 7 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
HDMI | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 or 80 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 or 2500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 or GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI |