NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 62.7 billion / sec
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- Around 55% better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 1,585 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 1168.7x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 76.687 vs 25.21
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 890.785 vs 561.43
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 November 2015 vs 26 March 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s vs 62.7 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 1,585 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 vs 25.21 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 890.785 vs 561.43 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.868 vs 28.659
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 vs 28.659 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 76.687 | 25.21 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 890.785 | 561.43 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.659 | 30.868 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3333 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9507 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GM206 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 26 November 2015 | 26 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 960 | 836 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1176 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 1,585 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 62.7 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | 2,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.2 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6100 + nForce Go 430
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R9 M360
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM vs
AMDRadeon 680M
