NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs AMD Radeon HD 8970M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and AMD Radeon HD 8970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5157 vs 2521
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 3688
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 2595
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5157 vs 2521
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 3688
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 2595
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 14 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5157 vs 2521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 vs 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 vs 2595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5157 vs 2521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 vs 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 vs 2595 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8970M
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 72 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
- Around 66% better floating-point performance: 2,304 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3876 vs 3465
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 312
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20588 vs 12495
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 57.241 vs 49.772
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1223.742 vs 757.295
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.78 vs 3.67
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.306 vs 49.875
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 268.643 vs 179.567
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 72 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3876 vs 3465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 vs 312 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20588 vs 12495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.241 vs 49.772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1223.742 vs 757.295 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.78 vs 3.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.306 vs 49.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 268.643 vs 179.567 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8970M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | AMD Radeon HD 8970M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3465 | 3876 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | 807 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12495 | 20588 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.772 | 57.241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 757.295 | 1223.742 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.67 | 5.78 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 | 89.306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.567 | 268.643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5157 | 2521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 | 2595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5157 | 2521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 | 2595 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | AMD Radeon HD 8970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Neptune |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 14 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 553 | 555 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | 850 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,800 million |
Compute units | 20 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
PowerTune | ||
ZeroCore |