NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and NVIDIA GRID K260Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3465 vs 2949
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 1898
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 1954
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 1898
- 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 1954
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 vs 28 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3465 vs 2949 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 vs 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 vs 1954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 vs 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 vs 1954 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K260Q
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
- Around 65% better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 312
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6474 vs 5157
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6474 vs 5157
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 vs 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 vs 5157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K260Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | NVIDIA GRID K260Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3465 | 2949 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | 361 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12495 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.772 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 757.295 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.567 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5157 | 6474 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 | 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 | 1954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5157 | 6474 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 | 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 | 1954 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | NVIDIA GRID K260Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 13 March 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 550 | 552 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $937 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 95.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |