NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A versus NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and NVIDIA GRID K260Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 38% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 745 MHz
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3465 versus 2949
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 versus 1898
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 versus 1954
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 versus 1898
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 versus 1954
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 28 June 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 745 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3465 versus 2949 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 versus 1898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 versus 1954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 versus 1898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 versus 1954 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID K260Q
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 95.36 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 640
- Environ 65% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,289 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 versus 312
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6474 versus 5157
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6474 versus 5157
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 95.36 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,289 gflops versus 1,389 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 versus 312 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 versus 5157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 versus 5157 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K260Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | NVIDIA GRID K260Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3465 | 2949 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | 361 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12495 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.772 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 757.295 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.67 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.567 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5157 | 6474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 | 1898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 | 1954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5157 | 6474 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 | 1898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 | 1954 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | NVIDIA GRID K260Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 550 | 552 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $937 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | 95.36 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
NVIDIAGRID K260Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2200M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
