NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 863 MHz
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1085 MHz versus 902 MHz
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.772 versus 30.133
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 179.567 versus 148.747
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 versus 3582
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 versus 3331
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 versus 3582
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 versus 3331
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 10 September 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 863 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz versus 902 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.772 versus 30.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.567 versus 148.747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 versus 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 versus 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 versus 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 versus 3331 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 173.2 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- 3.6x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 640
- 3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,156 gflops versus 1,389 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 20% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1441.971 versus 757.295
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.36 versus 3.67
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.264 versus 49.875
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9209 versus 5157
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9209 versus 5157
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 173.2 GTexel / s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,156 gflops versus 1,389 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1441.971 versus 757.295 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.36 versus 3.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.264 versus 49.875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9209 versus 5157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9209 versus 5157 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3355 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12495 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.772 | 30.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 757.295 | 1441.971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.67 | 7.36 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 | 64.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.567 | 148.747 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5157 | 9209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 | 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5157 | 9209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 | 3582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 | 3331 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK110B |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 10 September 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 554 | 555 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | 4,156 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2304 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.4 GTexel / s | 173.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 7,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
NVIDIAP104-100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
AMDRadeon Pro 560X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A vs
NVIDIACMP 50HX
