NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 6.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 96
• 5.9x better floating-point performance: 1,505 gflops vs 253.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3366 vs 532
• Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 245 vs 152
• 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10985 vs 2387
• 10.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 vs 5.055
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 vs 215.004
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.692 vs 0.635
• 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 vs 10.393
• 8.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.513 vs 19.903
• 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 vs 967
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2766
• 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 vs 967
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2766

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3366 532
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	245 152
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10985 2387
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.294 5.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	795.325 215.004
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.692 0.635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	51.794 10.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	174.513 19.903
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5264 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5264 967
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3714 2766
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3359

Compare specifications (specs)