NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- 6.7x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 96
- 5.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,505 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 39% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2500 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 6.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3366 versus 532
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 245 versus 152
- 4.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10985 versus 2387
- 10.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 versus 5.055
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 versus 215.004
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.692 versus 0.635
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 versus 10.393
- 8.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.513 versus 19.903
- 5.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 versus 967
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 2766
- 5.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 versus 967
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 2766
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,505 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3366 versus 532 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 versus 152 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10985 versus 2387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 versus 5.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 versus 215.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 versus 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 versus 10.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 versus 19.903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 versus 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 2766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 versus 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 2766 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 75 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3366 | 532 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 | 152 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10985 | 2387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 | 5.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 | 215.004 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 | 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 | 10.393 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 | 19.903 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 | 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 2766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 | 967 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 2766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1231 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 22 March 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 735 | 1390 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,505 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 47.04 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| DirectX 11.2 | 12 API | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
ATIRadeon X700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
AMDRadeon 630
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
IntelUHD Graphics 710
