NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 68% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 73.6 GTexel / s versus 43.9 billion / sec
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 480
- Environ 68% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,355 gflops versus 1,405.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 4.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 219 Watt
- Environ 60% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2 GB versus 1280 MB
- Environ 32% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2500 MHz versus 1900 MHz (3800 data rate)
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14288 versus 13251
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.59 versus 36.849
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.947 versus 40.08
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.296 versus 122.953
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5783 versus 4862
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5783 versus 4862
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 9 January 2015 versus 7 December 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 73.6 GTexel / s versus 43.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1024 versus 480 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,355 gflops versus 1,405.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 219 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1280 MB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz versus 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14288 versus 13251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.59 versus 36.849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.947 versus 40.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.296 versus 122.953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5783 versus 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 versus 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5783 versus 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Environ 55% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1464 MHz versus 944 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3924 versus 3797
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 470 versus 336
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.185 versus 720.592
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.369 versus 3.903
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3668 versus 2566
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3668 versus 2566
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1464 MHz versus 944 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3924 versus 3797 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 470 versus 336 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.185 versus 720.592 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 versus 3.903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 versus 2566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 versus 2566 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3797 | 3924 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 | 470 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14288 | 13251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.59 | 36.849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 720.592 | 736.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.903 | 4.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.947 | 40.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.296 | 122.953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5783 | 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2566 | 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5783 | 4862 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2566 | 3668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1831 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GM204 | GF110 |
Date de sortie | 9 January 2015 | 7 December 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 731 | 734 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | |
Prix maintenant | $99.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 944 MHz | 1464 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 1024 | 480 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,355 gflops | 1,405.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 480 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 73.6 GTexel / s | 43.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 219 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 3,000 million |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 1 | 3-way |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1280 MB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
3D Vision | ||
Surround |