NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 475 MHz
- 7.2x more texture fill rate: 109 billion / sec vs 15.2 GTexel / s
- 6.5x more pipelines: 1664 vs 256
- 8.1x better floating-point performance: 3,920 gflops vs 486.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 6.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 1476
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 382
- 5.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28498 vs 5013
- 7.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 105.107 vs 13.345
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1225.96 vs 306.122
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.737 vs 1.552
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.714 vs 20.453
- 12.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 490.688 vs 39.651
- 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 2079
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3472
- 5.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 2079
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3472
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 September 2014 vs 2 November 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 475 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 109 billion / sec vs 15.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1664 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops vs 486.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 vs 1476 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 382 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 vs 5013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 vs 13.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 vs 306.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 vs 1.552 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 vs 20.453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 vs 39.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 vs 2079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3472 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 vs 2079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3472 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 142 Watt vs 148 Watt
- 401.1x more memory clock speed: 2808 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 142 Watt vs 148 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2808 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3340 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 | 1476 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 | 382 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 | 5013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 | 13.345 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 | 306.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 | 1.552 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | 20.453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 | 39.651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 | 2079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3472 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 | 2079 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3472 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 369 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | NVIDIA Quadro 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GM204 | GF100 |
Launch date | 19 September 2014 | 2 November 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $1,199 |
Place in performance rating | 371 | 1047 |
Price now | $407.76 | $141.66 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | 17.08 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz | 475 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1664 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | 486.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Pipelines | 1664 | 256 |
Texture fill rate | 109 billion / sec | 15.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt | 142 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 241 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pins | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s | 89.9 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 2808 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |