NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M versus AMD FirePro D700
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M and AMD FirePro D700 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 924 MHz versus 850 MHz
- 3.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 81 Watt versus 274 Watt
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8546 versus 6051
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8546 versus 6051
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 versus 18 January 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 924 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt versus 274 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 versus 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 versus 6051 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro D700
- Environ 31% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 108.8 GTexel / s versus 83.04 GTexel / s
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1280
- Environ 31% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,482 gflops versus 2,657 gflops
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5480 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 25127 versus 19001
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 74.325 versus 59.428
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1338.806 versus 1113.788
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.419 versus 4.157
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 91.354 versus 39.101
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3699
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3699
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 108.8 GTexel / s versus 83.04 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,482 gflops versus 2,657 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5480 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 25127 versus 19001 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.325 versus 59.428 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1338.806 versus 1113.788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.419 versus 4.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.354 versus 39.101 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3342 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D700
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | AMD FirePro D700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5691 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 378 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19001 | 25127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 59.428 | 74.325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1113.788 | 1338.806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.157 | 6.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.101 | 91.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.909 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8546 | 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8546 | 6051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 472 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M | AMD FirePro D700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM204 | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 7 October 2014 | 18 January 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,560.89 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 568 | 569 |
| Prix maintenant | $1,899 | |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 3.99 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 924 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1280 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,657 gflops | 3,482 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2048 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 83.04 GTexel / s | 108.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 81 Watt | 274 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,200 million | 4,313 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Longeur | 279 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 120 GB / s | 263.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 5480 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
ATIRadeon X700 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDFirePro D700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M385X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970M vs
NVIDIAT1000
