NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti and ATI Radeon X1950 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 29.3x more texture fill rate: 176 billion / sec vs 6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 24x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 256 MB
- 129.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13758 vs 106
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 852 vs 279
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 vs 2517
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 vs 2517
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 June 2015 vs 29 January 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 176 billion / sec vs 6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13758 vs 106 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 852 vs 279 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 vs 2517 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 vs 2517 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1950 GT
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 57 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 171.4x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 57 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1950 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | ATI Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13758 | 106 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 852 | 279 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42988 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | 2517 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | 2517 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1321 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | ATI Radeon X1950 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | R500 |
| Code name | GM200 | RV570 |
| Launch date | 2 June 2015 | 29 January 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $140 |
| Place in performance rating | 310 | 944 |
| Price now | $679.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1075 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2816 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 2816 | |
| Texture fill rate | 176 billion / sec | 6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 57 Watt |
| Transistor count | 8,000 million | 330 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.5 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 390
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 380X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 1024SP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti vs
NVIDIAP102-100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980 Ti vs
IntelArc A380
