NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs AMD Radeon HD 7690M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z and AMD Radeon HD 7690M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 876 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 19.4x more texture fill rate: 338 billion / sec vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- 12x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 480
- 14.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,046 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 1 GB
- 9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8987 vs 1003
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 576
- 18.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22732 vs 1242
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 May 2014 vs 25 December 2011 |
Boost clock speed | 876 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 338 billion / sec vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2880 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops vs 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8987 vs 1003 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 vs 576 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22732 vs 1242 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7690M
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 705 MHz
- 18.8x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 375 Watt
- 257.1x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 705 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7690M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | AMD Radeon HD 7690M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8987 | 1003 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 | 576 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22732 | 1242 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.419 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1261.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.89 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.882 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 309.857 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8124 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2413 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2226 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8124 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2413 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2226 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | AMD Radeon HD 7690M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK110B | Thames |
Launch date | 28 May 2014 | 25 December 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
Place in performance rating | 395 | 389 |
Price now | $1,580 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | 725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 705 MHz | 725 MHz |
CUDA cores | 5760 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2880 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 338 billion / sec | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 375 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 716 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 672 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 / DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |