NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 705 MHz
- Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 876 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 375 Watt
- 1001.1x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22895 vs 22732
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 66.419
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.794 vs 1261.593
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 17.882
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 417.823 vs 309.857
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 8124
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 2413
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3316 vs 2226
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 8124
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 2413
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3316 vs 2226
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 28 May 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1076 MHz vs 705 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22895 vs 22732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 113.416 vs 66.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.794 vs 1261.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.206 vs 17.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 417.823 vs 309.857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10251 vs 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 vs 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3316 vs 2226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10251 vs 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 vs 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3316 vs 2226 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- 3.6x more texture fill rate: 338 billion / sec vs 94.72 GTexel / s
- 7.5x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 768
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,046 gflops vs 3,031 gflops
- 2.4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 5 GB
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8905 vs 6932
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 639 vs 632
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.89 vs 6.736
- 5.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 2958
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 338 billion / sec vs 94.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2880 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops vs 3,031 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 5 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8905 vs 6932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 639 vs 632 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.89 vs 6.736 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 vs 2958 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6932 | 8905 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 632 | 639 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22895 | 22732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 113.416 | 66.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.794 | 1261.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.736 | 7.89 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.206 | 17.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 417.823 | 309.857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10251 | 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 | 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3316 | 2226 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10251 | 8124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 | 2413 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3316 | 2226 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2958 | 17055 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP106 | GK110B |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 28 May 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $585 | $2,999 |
Place in performance rating | 403 | 404 |
Price now | $429.99 | $1,580 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.44 | 6.46 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 876 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1076 MHz | 705 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | 2x 5,046 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2x 2880 |
Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | 338 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 375 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA cores | 5760 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 201 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | 672 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |