NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 705 MHz
  • Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 876 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 375 Watt
  • 1001.1x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
  • Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22889 vs 22732
  • Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 66.419
  • Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.794 vs 1261.593
  • 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 17.882
  • Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 417.823 vs 309.857
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 8124
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 2413
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3316 vs 2226
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 8124
  • Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 2413
  • Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3316 vs 2226
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 6 February 2017 vs 28 May 2014
Core clock speed 1076 MHz vs 705 MHz
Boost clock speed 1480 MHz vs 876 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 375 Watt
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 22889 vs 22732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 113.416 vs 66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1414.794 vs 1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 81.206 vs 17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 417.823 vs 309.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10251 vs 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3681 vs 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3316 vs 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10251 vs 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3681 vs 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3316 vs 2226

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

  • 3.6x more texture fill rate: 338 billion / sec vs 94.72 GTexel / s
  • 7.5x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 768
  • 3.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,046 gflops vs 3,031 gflops
  • 2.4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 5 GB
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8942 vs 6927
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 635
  • Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.89 vs 6.736
  • 5.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 2958
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 338 billion / sec vs 94.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2x 2880 vs 768
Floating-point performance 2x 5,046 gflops vs 3,031 gflops
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 5 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8942 vs 6927
PassMark - G2D Mark 650 vs 635
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.89 vs 6.736
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 17055 vs 2958

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6927
8942
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
635
650
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
22889
22732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
113.416
66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1414.794
1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.736
7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
81.206
17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
417.823
309.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10251
8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3681
2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3316
2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10251
8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3681
2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3316
2226
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
2958
17055
Name NVIDIA Quadro P2000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
PassMark - G3D Mark 6927 8942
PassMark - G2D Mark 635 650
Geekbench - OpenCL 22889 22732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 113.416 66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1414.794 1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.736 7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 81.206 17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 417.823 309.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10251 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3681 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3316 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10251 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3681 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3316 2226
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2958 17055

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Kepler
Code name GP106 GK110B
Launch date 6 February 2017 28 May 2014
Launch price (MSRP) $585 $2,999
Place in performance rating 403 401
Price now $429.99 $1,580
Type Workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 19.44 6.46

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1480 MHz 876 MHz
Core clock speed 1076 MHz 705 MHz
Floating-point performance 3,031 gflops 2x 5,046 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 2x 2880
Texture fill rate 94.72 GTexel / s 338 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 375 Watt
Transistor count 4,400 million 7,080 million
CUDA cores 5760

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 201 mm 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None Two 8-pin
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 140.2 GB / s 672 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 768-bit (384-bit per GPU)
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA