NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 705 MHz
• Around 69% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 876 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 375 Watt
• 1001.1x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 66.419
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.794 vs 1261.593
• 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 17.882
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 417.823 vs 309.857
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 8124
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 2413
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3316 vs 2226
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 8124
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 2413
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3316 vs 2226

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

• 3.6x more texture fill rate: 338 billion / sec vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• 7.5x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 768
• 3.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,046 gflops vs 3,031 gflops
• 2.4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8987 vs 6934
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 644
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22732 vs 22528
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.89 vs 6.736
• 5.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 2958

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6934 8987
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	644 656
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22528 22732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	113.416 66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1414.794 1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.736 7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	81.206 17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	417.823 309.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 2226
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 17055

Compare specifications (specs)