NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 338 billion / sec vs 210 billion / sec
• 2x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 2880
• Around 89% better floating-point performance: 2x 5,046 gflops vs 5,345 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 635
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.89 vs 6.854
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 309.857 vs 182.11
• 5.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 3342

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

• Around 24% higher core clock speed: 875 MHz vs 705 MHz
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 928 MHz vs 876 MHz
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 375 Watt
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9517 vs 8987
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28211 vs 22732
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.429 vs 66.419
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2001.15 vs 1261.593
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.067 vs 17.882
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10021 vs 8124
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 2413
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 2226
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10021 vs 8124
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 2413
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 2226

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8987 9517
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	656 635
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22732 28211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	66.419 75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1261.593 2001.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.89 6.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.882 58.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.857 182.11
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8124 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2413 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2226 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8124 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2413 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2226 3342
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	17055 3342

Compare specifications (specs)