NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 19% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 706 MHz
• Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 187.5 billion / sec vs 146.8 GTexel / s
• Around 8% higher pipelines: 2688 vs 2496
• Around 34% better floating-point performance: 4,709 gflops vs 3,524 gflops
• Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8192 vs 4432
• 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 648 vs 210
• Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24400 vs 14510
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 62.027 vs 54.89
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.835 vs 5.303
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10176 vs 8319
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10176 vs 8319

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 866.7x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.755 vs 1218.137
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 83.807 vs 36.842
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 250.291 vs 215.546
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3715
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3356
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3715
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8192 4432
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	648 210
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	24400 14510
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	62.027 54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1218.137 1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.835 5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.842 83.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.546 250.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10176 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 10873
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10176 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 10873

Compare specifications (specs)