NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce 930MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 952 MHz
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1417 vs 1288
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2197 vs 2053
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2197 vs 2053
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 1 March 2016 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 952 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1417 vs 1288 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 vs 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 vs 2053 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 993 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 24.48 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 783.4 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
- Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 189
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5533 vs 4256
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 vs 3502
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 vs 3502
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops vs 762.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 189 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5533 vs 4256 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 vs 3502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 vs 3502 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1417 | 1288 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 | 195 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4256 | 5533 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 | 3577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 | 3577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.09 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM108 | GM108 |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 1 March 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 891 | 1100 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 952 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 783.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 23.83 GTexel / s | 24.48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 17 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
GPU Boost |