NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce MX110

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 21% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 797 MHz
Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 915 MHz
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 November 2017 vs 10 March 2014
Core clock speed	965 MHz vs 797 MHz
Boost clock speed	993 MHz vs 915 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
Around 82% better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3048 vs 1435
Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 189
2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10317 vs 4276
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4938 vs 2197
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4938 vs 2197
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3502
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3502

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	43.4 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 256
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3048 vs 1435
PassMark - G2D Mark	225 vs 189
Geekbench - OpenCL	10317 vs 4276
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4938 vs 2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4938 vs 2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3684 vs 3502
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3684 vs 3502

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1435

3048

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

189

225

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4276

10317

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2197

4938

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2197

4938

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3502

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3502

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3340

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3352

3340

Name	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1435	3048
PassMark - G2D Mark	189	225
Geekbench - OpenCL	4276	10317
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2197	4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2197	4938
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3502	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3502	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3352	3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3352	3340
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		22.828
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		210.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		28.662
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		162.83
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1151

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM108	GK104
Launch date	17 November 2017	10 March 2014
Place in performance rating	911	904
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	993 MHz	915 MHz
Core clock speed	965 MHz	797 MHz
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops	1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	256	640
Texture fill rate	23.83 GTexel / s	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	75 Watt
CUDA cores		1152 or 640
Transistor count		3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB / s	80.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5 / DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers
3D Blu-Ray
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
SLI
TXAA