NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA GeForce MX110 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 1435.2x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16959 vs 4271
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 vs 2197
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 vs 2197
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 17 November 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 993 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16959 vs 4271 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 vs 2197 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 vs 2197 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 420 MHz
- 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 2173
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 2173
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 420 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 vs 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 vs 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16959 | 4271 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 2197 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 3502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 2197 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 3502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3352 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1432 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 189 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
| Code name | TU117 | GM108 |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 17 November 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 901 | 904 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 965 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 256 |
| Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 23.83 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 40.1 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 / DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T400 with others
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
NVIDIAT400 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAT400 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4200
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX110
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
