AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce MX110 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 57.2 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 704 vs 256
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,830 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1838 vs 1432
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 485 vs 189
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13288 vs 4271
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 17 November 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 993 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 704 vs 256 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops vs 762.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1838 vs 1432 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 vs 189 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13288 vs 4271 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2197 vs 2156
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 2475
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2197 vs 2156
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 2475
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 vs 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 vs 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1838 | 1432 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 | 189 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13288 | 4271 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | 2197 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 | 3502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | 2197 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 | 3502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Owl | GM108 |
| Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 17 November 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 903 | 904 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 965 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 704 | 256 |
| Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s | 23.83 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 / DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Vega 11 with others
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAP106-090
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX110
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAT400
