AMD Radeon Vega 11 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Vega 11 and NVIDIA GeForce MX110 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 11
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 57.2 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 704 vs 256
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,830 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1842 vs 1435
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 vs 189
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13226 vs 4276
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 February 2018 vs 17 November 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 993 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 704 vs 256 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops vs 762.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1842 vs 1435 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 vs 189 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13226 vs 4276 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2197 vs 2156
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3502 vs 2475
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2197 vs 2156
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3502 vs 2475
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2197 vs 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3502 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2197 vs 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3502 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Vega 11
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1842 | 1435 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 189 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13226 | 4276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.582 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 371.843 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.156 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.449 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | 2197 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 | 3502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | 2197 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 | 3502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Vega 11 | NVIDIA GeForce MX110 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Owl | GM108 |
| Launch date | 13 February 2018 | 17 November 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 903 | 911 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 965 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,830 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 704 | 256 |
| Texture fill rate | 57.2 GTexel / s | 23.83 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 / DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Vega 11 with others
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1150 IGP
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7150M + nForce 630M
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
AMDRadeon Vega 11 vs
NVIDIAT400
