NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX110 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX110

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 6% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 914 MHz
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1000 or 2500 MHz
Launch date 17 November 2017 vs 13 March 2015
Core clock speed 965 MHz vs 914 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 1000 or 2500 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

  • Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 993 MHz
  • Around 89% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
  • 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
  • Around 89% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2577 vs 1417
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 189
  • 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9744 vs 4256
  • Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 vs 2197
  • Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 vs 2197
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3502
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3502
Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed 1124 MHz vs 993 MHz
Texture fill rate 44.96 GTexel / s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 256
Floating-point performance 1,439 gflops vs 762.6 gflops
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2577 vs 1417
PassMark - G2D Mark 217 vs 189
Geekbench - OpenCL 9744 vs 4256
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4148 vs 2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4148 vs 2197
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3502
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1417
2577
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
189
217
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4256
9744
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2197
4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2197
4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3502
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3502
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3358
Name NVIDIA GeForce MX110 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1417 2577
PassMark - G2D Mark 189 217
Geekbench - OpenCL 4256 9744
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2197 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2197 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3502 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3502 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 3358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 42.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 373.644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 39.412
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 139.158
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3350

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Maxwell
Code name GM108 GM107
Launch date 17 November 2017 13 March 2015
Place in performance rating 891 797
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 993 MHz 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 965 MHz 914 MHz
Floating-point performance 762.6 gflops 1,439 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 256 640
Texture fill rate 23.83 GTexel / s 44.96 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 75 Watt
CUDA cores 640
Transistor count 1,870 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support 1
HDMI
VGA аnalog display support 1

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 40.1 GB / s 32 or 80 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 1000 or 2500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 / DDR3 DDR3 or GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
Optimus
Verde Drivers
Adaptive VSync
Ansel
BatteryBoost
DSR
GameStream
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
SLI