NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 863 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 vs 8.832
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.034 vs 0.731
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 vs 19.952
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 vs 43.535
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 3275
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3333
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 3275
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3333
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 vs 30 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1122 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 863 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 vs 8.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 vs 0.731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 vs 19.952 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 vs 43.535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 39% better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1998 vs 1835
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 vs 196
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7244 vs 6509
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 vs 406.203
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 2796
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 2796
- Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 759 vs 632
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops vs 953.9 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1998 vs 1835 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 vs 196 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7244 vs 6509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 vs 406.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 vs 2796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 vs 2796 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 vs 632 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1835 | 1998 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 196 | 289 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6509 | 7244 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 8.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 520.747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 0.731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 19.952 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 43.535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | 3188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | 3188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3333 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 | 759 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM108 | GK106 |
Launch date | 17 November 2017 | 30 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1057 | 1059 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1242 MHz | 863 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1122 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 953.9 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 29.81 GTexel / s | 55.23 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Verde Drivers |