NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 863 MHz
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 vs 8.832
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.034 vs 0.731
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 vs 19.952
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 vs 43.535
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 3275
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3333
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 3275
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3333

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

• Around 85% higher texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• Around 39% better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1998 vs 1833
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 vs 196
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7240 vs 6520
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 vs 406.203
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 2796
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 2796
• Around 20% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 759 vs 632

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 1998
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	196 289
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6520 7240
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.613 8.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	406.203 520.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.034 0.731
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.251 19.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	107.608 43.535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	632 759

Compare specifications (specs)