NVIDIA GeForce MX130 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 32% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1122 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 44% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1242 MHz versus 863 MHz
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 2.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 versus 8.832
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.034 versus 0.731
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 versus 19.952
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 versus 43.535
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 versus 3275
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3333
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 versus 3275
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3333
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 November 2017 versus 30 May 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1122 MHz versus 850 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1242 MHz versus 863 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 versus 8.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 versus 0.731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 versus 19.952 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 versus 43.535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 versus 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 versus 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3333 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- Environ 85% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 55.23 GTexel / s versus 29.81 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- Environ 39% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,326 gflops versus 953.9 gflops
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1998 versus 1834
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 289 versus 196
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7244 versus 6495
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 versus 406.203
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 versus 2796
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 versus 2796
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 759 versus 632
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55.23 GTexel / s versus 29.81 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,326 gflops versus 953.9 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1998 versus 1834 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 289 versus 196 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7244 versus 6495 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 versus 406.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 versus 2796 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 versus 2796 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 versus 632 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1834 | 1998 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 196 | 289 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6495 | 7244 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 8.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 520.747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 0.731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 19.952 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 43.535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | 3188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | 3188 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3333 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 | 759 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM108 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 17 November 2017 | 30 May 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1057 | 1059 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1242 MHz | 863 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1122 MHz | 850 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s | 55.23 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Compte de transistor | 2,540 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 / DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Verde Drivers |