NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX130

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1122 MHz vs 914 MHz
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1000 or 2500 MHz
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 406.203 vs 373.644

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 29.81 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 51% better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 953.9 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2577 vs 1814
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 195
• Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9744 vs 6461
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 vs 31.613
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.54 vs 2.034
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.412 vs 30.251
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.158 vs 107.608
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 vs 2796
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3686
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 vs 2796
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3686
• 5.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3350 vs 632

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1814 2577
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	195 217
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6461 9744
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.613 42.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	406.203 373.644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.034 2.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.251 39.412
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	107.608 139.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2796 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	632 3350

Compare specifications (specs)