NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX150 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel / s vs 19.7 billion / sec
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 384 vs 288
- Around 83% better floating-point performance: 1,127 gflops vs 616.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2265 vs 1953
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 732
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1112
- 5.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 732
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1112
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 May 2017 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s vs 19.7 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 288 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops vs 616.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2265 vs 1953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 1112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 1112 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Around 94% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 413 vs 213
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 937 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 vs 213 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2265 | 1953 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 | 413 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9599 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 1112 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 1112 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | GP108 | GF104 |
| Launch date | 17 May 2017 | 3 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 899 | 902 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | 616.3 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 288 |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | 19.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | 60.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX150 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 448 Go
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470M
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
AMDRadeon R5 340 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
NVIDIAGeForce MX150 vs
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
