NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon Pro 555X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 907 MHz
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5100 MHz
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 35.283
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2350
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2350
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 16 July 2018 |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 907 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5100 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 vs 35.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555X
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12706 vs 9329
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 668.308 vs 535.24
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.158 vs 2.64
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.593 vs 44.7
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 170.952 vs 141.816
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4093 vs 4027
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4093 vs 4027
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12706 vs 9329 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 668.308 vs 535.24 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.158 vs 2.64 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.593 vs 44.7 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 170.952 vs 141.816 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4093 vs 4027 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4093 vs 4027 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon Pro 555X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9329 | 12706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | 35.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | 668.308 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | 3.158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | 49.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | 170.952 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 4093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 2350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon Pro 555X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP108B | Polaris 21 |
Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 16 July 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 861 | 964 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 907 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5100 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |