NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 3.1x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 vs 2106
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 40.991
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 vs 364.578
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 3455
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3107
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 3455
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1857
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3107

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• Around 83% higher pipelines: 704 vs 384
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 vs 240
• Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14583 vs 9329
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 vs 2.64
• Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 vs 44.7
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 vs 141.816
• Around 35% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1201 vs 888

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 2106
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	240 518
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9329 14583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.992 40.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	535.24 364.578
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.64 3.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.7 54.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	141.816 262.35
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3107
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	888 1201

Compare specifications (specs)