NVIDIA GeForce MX250 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce MX250

versus

AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX250

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 937 MHz versus 300 MHz
6.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 65 Watt
Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 versus 2106
Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 versus 40.991
Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 versus 364.578
Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 versus 3455
2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 1857
Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3107
Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 versus 3455
2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 1857
Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3107

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	21 February 2019 versus 13 February 2018
Vitesse du noyau	937 MHz versus 300 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt versus 65 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	2392 versus 2106
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	46.992 versus 40.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	535.24 versus 364.578
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4027 versus 3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3710 versus 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357 versus 3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4027 versus 3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3710 versus 1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357 versus 3107

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1240 MHz versus 1038 MHz
Environ 83% de pipelines plus haut: 704 versus 384
2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 versus 240
Environ 56% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14583 versus 9329
Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.196 versus 2.64
Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.784 versus 44.7
Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 262.35 versus 141.816
Environ 35% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1201 versus 888

Caractéristiques
Vitesse augmenté	1240 MHz versus 1038 MHz
Pipelines	704 versus 384
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	518 versus 240
Geekbench - OpenCL	14583 versus 9329
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.196 versus 2.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	54.784 versus 44.7
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	262.35 versus 141.816
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1201 versus 888

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2392

2106

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

240

518

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9329

14583

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

46.992

40.991

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

535.24

364.578

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.64

3.196

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

44.7

54.784

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

141.816

262.35

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4027

3455

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3710

1857

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3107

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4027

3455

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3710

1857

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

3107

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

888

1201

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
PassMark - G3D Mark	2392	2106
PassMark - G2D Mark	240	518
Geekbench - OpenCL	9329	14583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	46.992	40.991
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	535.24	364.578
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.64	3.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	44.7	54.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	141.816	262.35
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4027	3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3710	1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	3107
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4027	3455
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3710	1857
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	3107
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	888	1201

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Essentiel
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 5.0
Nom de code	GP108B	Raven
Date de sortie	21 February 2019	13 February 2018
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	861	795
Genre	Laptop	Desktop
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1038 MHz	1240 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	937 MHz	300 MHz
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	384	704
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	10 Watt	65 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,800 million	4,940 million
Performance á point flottant		1,760 gflops
Taux de remplissage de la texture		55 GTexel / s
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	None
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	6008 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5
Mémoire partagé		0