NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• 3.1x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 vs 1894
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 vs 26.039
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 vs 176.928
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.64 vs 1.666
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 vs 27.603
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.816 vs 135.437
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 vs 2408
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3170
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 vs 2408
• Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3170
• Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 888 vs 862

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 240

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 1894
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	240 355
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.992 26.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	535.24 176.928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.64 1.666
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.7 27.603
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	141.816 135.437
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 2408
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 2408
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 3170
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 3352
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	888 862

Compare specifications (specs)