NVIDIA GeForce MX250 versus AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- 3.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 937 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 3.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2392 versus 1894
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.992 versus 26.039
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 535.24 versus 176.928
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.64 versus 1.666
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.7 versus 27.603
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.816 versus 135.437
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4027 versus 2408
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 3170
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4027 versus 2408
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 3170
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 888 versus 862
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 23 April 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 versus 1894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 versus 26.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 versus 176.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 versus 1.666 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 versus 27.603 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 versus 135.437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 versus 2408 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 versus 2408 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3352 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 versus 862 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1100 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 versus 240
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 versus 240 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2392 | 1894 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 355 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9329 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | 26.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | 176.928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | 1.666 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | 27.603 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | 135.437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | 2408 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | 2408 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3352 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 | 862 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | GP108B | Raven |
Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 23 April 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 861 | 931 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1038 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 937 MHz | 300 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 4,940 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |