NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 112
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 10.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2424 vs 482
- 4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 242 vs 61
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 February 2019 vs 29 October 2007 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 112 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2424 vs 482 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 vs 61 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3346 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 937 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 937 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2424 | 482 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 | 61 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9092 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.992 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 535.24 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.64 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.816 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4027 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4027 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 888 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
| Code name | GP108B | G92 |
| Launch date | 21 February 2019 | 29 October 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 885 | 1357 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 112 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 33.6 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX250 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 256 DDR
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X700
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8310E
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
NVIDIAP106-090
NVIDIAGeForce MX250 vs
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
