NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX250

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 1491
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1341
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 1491
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1341

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

• Around 7% higher core clock speed: 999 MHz vs 937 MHz
• Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 1038 MHz
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4020 vs 2392
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 285 vs 240
• Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12601 vs 9329
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6614 vs 4027
• Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6614 vs 4027
• 2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2076 vs 888

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2392 4020
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	240 285
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	9329 12601
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 6614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 1491
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 1341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4027 6614
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3710 1491
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3357 1341
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	888 2076

Compare specifications (specs)