NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs AMD FirePro V7900

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and AMD FirePro V7900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • 2.1x more core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 725 MHz
  • 659.7x more texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 58.0 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 15.1x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 151 Watt
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2453 vs 2305
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3808 vs 2996
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3808 vs 2996
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 vs 24 May 2011
Core clock speed 1531 MHz vs 725 MHz
Texture fill rate 38.26 GTexel/s vs 58.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 151 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2453 vs 2305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3808 vs 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3808 vs 2996

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V7900

  • 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
  • 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
  • 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27733 vs 10876
  • Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 230
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2784
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2784
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1280 vs 384
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 27733 vs 10876
PassMark - G2D Mark 336 vs 230
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3710 vs 2784
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3710 vs 2784

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V7900

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
10876
27733
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
230
336
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2453
2305
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2784
3710
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2784
3710
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3808
2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3808
2996
Name NVIDIA GeForce MX330 AMD FirePro V7900
Geekbench - OpenCL 10876 27733
PassMark - G2D Mark 230 336
PassMark - G3D Mark 2453 2305
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2784 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2784 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3808 2996
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3808 2996
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.134
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 676.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.309
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 36.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 171.25

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce MX330 AMD FirePro V7900

Essentials

Architecture Pascal TeraScale 3
Code name GP108 Cayman
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 24 May 2011
Place in performance rating 765 846
Type Laptop Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1594 MHz
Core clock speed 1531 MHz 725 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1,224 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 1280
Pixel fill rate 25.50 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 38.26 GTexel/s 58.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt 151 Watt
Transistor count 1800 million 2,640 million
Floating-point performance 1,856.0 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count 4
Dual-link DVI support
StereoOutput3D

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin
Width IGP
Bus support PCIe 2.1 x16
Form factor Full Height / Full Length
Length 279 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 11.2 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 48.06 GB/s 160 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5