NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs AMD FirePro V7900
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and AMD FirePro V7900 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 659.7x more texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 58.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 15.1x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 151 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2453 vs 2305
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3808 vs 2996
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3808 vs 2996
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 24 May 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s vs 58.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 151 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2453 vs 2305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 vs 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 vs 2996 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V7900
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27733 vs 10876
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 336 vs 230
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2784
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2784
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27733 vs 10876 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 336 vs 230 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 2784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 2784 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: AMD FirePro V7900
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | AMD FirePro V7900 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10876 | 27733 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 336 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2453 | 2305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 | 2996 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 | 2996 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.134 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 676.409 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.309 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.678 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.25 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | AMD FirePro V7900 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 3 |
Code name | GP108 | Cayman |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 24 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 765 | 846 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 25.50 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s | 58.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 1800 million | 2,640 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,856.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 160 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |